J. Fearnley
To Win
T. Machac
To Win
Tomas Machac vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Machac 2 - 3 Zandschulp
They have played 14 sets in total, with Machac winning 6 and Zandschulp winning 8. The last match between Machac and Zandschulp was at the U.S. Open - New York, 29-08-2022, First, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 3-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | 2 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 3 |
U.S. Open - New York(29-08-2022)
3
6
7
6
6
1
3
6
7
5
| Machac | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (15-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (10-14) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| 20 | Ranking | 88 |
| 20 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 24 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 7 |
| 66% (273-138) | Career Total W/L | 61% (363-228) |
| $3,180,290 | Career Prize Money | $3,456,920 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 2 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Machac VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(3) 6-1 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tomas Machac
54%
(
83 of
153)
1st Serve %
55%
(
94 of
170)
17
Aces
8
12
Double Faults
4
83%
(
69 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
62 of
94)
46%
(
32 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
52 of
153)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
63 of
170)
164
Total Points Won
159
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(5) |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tomas Machac
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
62 of
86)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Tomas Machac
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Machac VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 8 |
| 70 | Games Won | 68 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 41 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 24 |
| 2:10:46 | Average Match Time | 2:10:46 |
| 58% (269/461) | 1st Serve % | 57% (254/445) |
| 66% (178/269) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (183/254) |
| 56% (107/192) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (87/191) |
| 46% (16/35) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (14/43) |
| 39% (175/445) | Return Points Win % | 38% (176/461) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tomas Machac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Machac
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Sebastian Baez
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Tomas Machac
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
41
|
4-6 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
37 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Daniel Altmaier
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (273/138) | Win/Loss | 61% (363/228) |
| 64% (618/342) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (828/593) |
| 55% (4981/4065) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7124/6299) |
| 69% (83/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 64% (78/44) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (170/106) |
| 68% (106/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 50% (6/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 1762 | Aces Total | 2892 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 786 | Total Double Faults | 2142 |
| 1:36:1 | Average Match Time | 1:35:39 |
| 335.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 178.14 |
| 62% (17070/27569) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24087/39122) |
| 71% (12095/17041) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17215/24087) |
| 54% (5687/10525) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7238/15038) |
| 43% (1248/2886) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1781/4127) |
| 40% (11464/28499) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16381/40296) |
| 66% (31/16) | Slam W/L | 62% (32/20) |
| 57% (17/13) | Masters W/L | 49% (26/27) |
| 73% (8/3) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 65% (45/24) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (116/56) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 69% (54/24) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 70% (256/366) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/539) |
| 52% (14/27) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 59% (88/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (100/183) |
| 54% (63/116) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/195) |
| 88% (274/241) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
| 10% (274/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
| 23% (136/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (247/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
